Dealing with Turkey’s aggressive behaviour

It has been repeatedly pointed out that we should not personalise Turkish aggression because President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s attitude toward Greece goes beyond his abrasive authoritarian style. It is an approach in essence shared by most of our neighbour’s political forces, not just the extreme nationalists.

Just a few days ago, the leader of the CHP, Turkey’s biggest opposition party, Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, who could succeed Erdoğan – if he is a candidate and wins the next presidential election – urged Erdoğan to “increase the pressure in the Mediterranean and the Aegean,” and even advised: “If you have the heart for it, take the step on the occupied and armed islands. We will support you.”

There is nothing partisan or ideological about Erdoğan’s revisionist strategy; it is espoused across party lines, with the exception of the pro-Kurdish HDP party and a handful of serious politicians individually.

This is the reality Greece is facing. The question is, what are we doing about it?

We will continue, obviously, to invest in our partnerships and alliances. It is evident that the reactions of important international players, from the United States to the EU (we had a very scathing report earlier this week on Turkey in the EU Parliament), and major European countries like Germany and France are not going unnoticed by Ankara – hence its response.

And Greece is also bolstering its deterrence capabilities – it’s under way, but is a process that takes time – as nobody else will be fighting any war for us, no matter how much they may support us.

Having noted all of the above, another key to managing Turkish aggression more effectively is political unity at home. Regardless of their different approaches to the issue, all the parties of the opposition ought to support a national position which, for his part, the prime minister could form with their feedback.

The government is the ultimate decision-maker, but it should not be so hard for the other parties – or at least the top three, which have experience in managing Greek-Turkish relations – to agree on some points of convergence.

No matter who is in power in Turkey, the three points of Greece’s stance are clear: steady alliances and partnerships defined by consistency and continuity; stronger deterrence capabilities; and domestic unity (the parties can bicker over taxes, pensions, healthcare and inflation, but not Turkey).

Lastly, a word of caution. Greece’s attitude needs to remain calm and level-headed, without forced moves and grandstanding, as some hotheads would like.

(A version of this article was originally published by the Kathimerini newspaper and is reproduced by permission.)

 

 

This block is broken or missing. You may be missing content or you might need to enable the original module.